MogalyticsPricing

Practice guide

Looking for a QOVES alternative? Here's what it costs, how it works, and why the two tools answer different questions.

QOVES is a venture-backed, human-reviewed facial analysis membership priced around $150/year, built for people researching cosmetic procedures. Here's what independent coverage says it costs and how it works, and an honest account of where Mogalytics's cheaper, instant, on-device tool fits a different job entirely.

Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Omoggle or QOVES.

What QOVES actually is

QOVES is a facial-analysis company, independently reported as venture-backed and incorporated in February 2024, that sells a report combining AI landmarking (521 points, per its own marketing) with manual review by a human team. The output is framed as a "transformation plan" citing 450+ evidence-based methods and rendered visualizations of possible changes, plus ongoing care-team chat access.

This is a different product category than a quick score-check app: it's positioned as pre-consultation research for people already weighing non-surgical or surgical changes, not an instant attractiveness reading.

What QOVES costs

QOVES doesn't publish a price list; the cost only appears at checkout on its own site. Independent 2026 coverage cites an annual membership of roughly $150 (that source itself notes the figure is unverified against actual checkout), covering the analysis, protocol, biometrics, visualizations, yearly updates, and care-team messaging. A prior one-time-report structure with named tiers has reportedly been discontinued in favor of the membership model.

Mogalytics has exactly one price: a $12 one-time unlock, the same for everyone, with no annual renewal and no membership.

Sources: QOVES's own website for offerings and marketing claims; Real World Appeal's QOVES review for the pricing, turnaround, and discontinued-tier claims; and Wikipedia for the February 2024 incorporation date — pricing, offerings, and claims shown there may change over time.

Human review versus instant, on-device reading

QOVES requires uploading standardized photos, and because every submission gets a manual review from its team, Real World Appeal's review reports a turnaround measured in days, not an instant score. That review layer is presumably part of what the price pays for.

Mogalytics never uploads a photo, video frame, or landmark for any of its six measurements. The reading runs entirely inside your own browser via on-device MediaPipe landmark detection and returns results immediately — there is no human review step and no waiting.

Two different questions, not a head-to-head

Mogalytics has no visibility into QOVES's internal process and makes no claim about it beyond what Real World Appeal's review reports: a real company with a real human-review layer, generally regarded as legitimate. That same review also notes its reports can read as generic relative to price, and that structural geometry measurements don't necessarily predict how a face is perceived socially — a limitation any geometry-based tool, including Mogalytics, shares.

If you're actually researching a cosmetic procedure, a human-reviewed report built for that purpose is a different tool for a different job than Mogalytics. Mogalytics doesn't offer procedure guidance, doesn't review photos with a human team, and isn't trying to.

Where Mogalytics actually differs

  • No photo, video frame, or landmark is ever uploaded — the whole reading runs in your browser.
  • One flat $12, one time. No $150 annual membership, no renewal billing.
  • Instant results, no multi-day human-review turnaround.
  • Six named geometry measurements you can inspect yourself, using a 30-frame trimmed-mean window built to reduce single-scan noise.

What it doesn't do: replace a live duel, offer cosmetic-procedure guidance, diagnose anything, or guarantee a specific score. It's a private setup-testing instrument, not a clinical consultation. See the practice guide for what it actually measures.

Related reads

  • Why most face-rating apps are free — the paywall-timing mechanics behind the cheaper end of this category.
  • Umax app alternative — a free-to-download, per-scan-paywalled example, priced far below QOVES.
  • Mogged/Umog app alternative — another named example with different pricing and upload details.
  • RateByFresh alternative — a free-scan-then-paywall example that calls its rating "objective," checked against independent testing.
  • LooksMax AI alternative — a free-scan example that blurs the verdict until you pay or refer three friends, scored against a template independent coverage calls narrow and Eurocentric.
  • Maxxing app alternative — a face score bundled with a paid glow-up routine and billing complaints in its own App Store reviews.
  • LooxUP app alternative — a reviewer reports the same face scoring 6.7 to 8.4 between scans, plus two duplicate "Premium week" listings and a similarly-named "Promo week" tier.
  • Moggr app alternative — a hairstyle-and-face scan with a boost-pack paywall and a review questioning whether the scan is even real AI.
  • Hiface app alternative — eight overlapping subscription tiers and a developer-admitted undisclosed extra-scan fee.
  • PSL Face Rating app alternative — a post-cancellation billing complaint and a review calling the score reader non-functional.
  • Face Rating AI: Beauty Score alternative — a reviewer calls its advertised free lifetime offer a "bait and switch," with ten overlapping or duplicate-named purchase listings.
  • PSL - Looksmax & Ascend alternative — a reviewer reports a results paywall they couldn't click off of, plus a separate review calling its advice generic AI output.
  • PSL AI-Jawmax, Looksmax & Mog alternative — two reviewers report paying and then hitting a recurring error, with one asking for a refund after no scan result was ever delivered.
  • PSLMax AI: Looksmax PSL Ascend alternative — a reviewer says the app's own before/after ad photos show two visibly different people.
  • Mogger: LooksMax AI alternative — an App Store reviewer titled their review "This app is a scam," with a separate reviewer asking for a refund after dull, repeated results.
  • Ascendr: PSL Scale Ascender alternative — multiple App Store reviewers independently titled their reviews "Cash grab" and "Just a money grab" over its purchase listing repeated nine times across seven different prices.
  • Face-rating & PSL apps compared — this app alongside dozens of others, pricing and one documented complaint each, in one sourced table.
  • UCHAD: See Your Potential alternative — a reviewer reports the app said their results were "locked" the moment they pressed "see my score," with payment required before any score was ever shown.
  • Omoggle alternatives, explained — the three different things people mean by that search, and which one Mogalytics is.
  • RealSmile alternative — a free-tier competitor with a published academic validation figure, and a gap between its "never leaves your device" marketing and its own privacy policy.

Unlock Mogalytics — $12 once: no upload, no subscription, no free tier.

Mogalytics is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by Omoggle or QOVES, and makes no claim about any specific third-party company's business model, safety, moderation, accuracy, or data-handling practices. Readings are camera-sensitive geometry estimates, not objective attractiveness, identity, medical, or cosmetic advice, and no purchase guarantees a score, a win, or a specific outcome from any procedure.